Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films, 2016
Images from the Internet
Creature from the Hillbilly Lagoon (aka Seepage!)
Directed and edited by Richard Griffin
Scorpio Films Releasing
90 minutes / 2005
The film can be seen HERE.
There are so many genres and subgenres
that it is interesting to look at them over time. For example, there was and is
plenty of Hillbilly stuff, especially in the 1970s. Hell, even Opie (aka Ron
Howard) started by directing in that field (for Roger Corman) with Grand Theft Auto (1977); and Burt
Reynold’s whole beginning oeuvre was
steeped in it.
Redneck horror is also a
sub-subgenre, with the likes of Redneck
Zombies (1989), Bloodsucking Redneck
Vampires (2004), I Spit Chew on Your
Grave (2008), The Legend of the Hillbilly
Butcher, and the short-film compilation The
Hillbilly Horror Show, Vol. 1 (2014), to name just a small amount.
But there is also a horny human-like fish-monster
subgenre as well, with the likes of
Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954, for which this film is named), The Horror of Party Beach (1964), and Humanoids from the Deep (1980; remade in
1996). Yes, I’ve seen nearly every one of those I’ve mentioned in the last two
paragraphs, I’m proud to say.
Most of the films I’ve cited, with
rare exceptions, are either comedies or unintentionally funny in a campy way
(e.g., Humanoids…). But beyond humorous, they tend to be outrageously so, because if you mock
someone’s culture, such as the white Deep South, you better make it obvious
that it is poking an elbow rather than pointing a finger, if you want to keep
your audience (commented on, somewhat, in the 2014 Bigfoot film, Stomping Ground). This is in the same
way that films like Car Wash (1976) or
Beauty Shop (2005) are presented,
with over-the-top stereotypical characters that are broad enough that many can
identify with and mock, rather than are being mocked directly (again, socially
commented on in Spike Lee’s 2000 social commentary, Bamboozled).
But I suppose that I should start
talking about the film at hand, shouldn’t I? Despite it being filmed in Connecticut (except for a coda scene in Rhode Island), director Richard
Griffin tackles the Redneck/Horny Man-Fish genres by wisely combining them into
an outrageous and profane comedy Seth Rogan would probably kill to be able to
do adequately (he would fail, though still attract an audience for some reason).
The acting is wooden, as usually is in backwoods low-comedy style, but nowhere
near as forceful and purposefully as it is in his last film, Seven Dorms of Death (2016). Considering
the decade-plus time difference of release, it’s interesting to compare them,
but I’m jumping ahead of myself.
Hillbillies gone huntin' |
In a bayou area of the Deep South,
the trope of spilling toxic chemicals (e.g., 2007’s Wasting Away [aka Ahh!!
Zombies!] and 2011’s Exit 101)
into the water is used to produce a hybrid human-fish (that is, man-into-fish,
not fish-into-man, or in today’s terminology, perhaps M2F[ish]). This brings four
factions contentiously colliding together: (a) a group of young science
students who are doing tests on the water (yet still skinny-dip in it); (b) a
gaggle of rednecks (two are named Bubba and Cooter) out huntin’, (c) the hitmen from a pharma company responsible for the
dumping who are trying to keep it all contained
by trying to kill everyone involved (as a reference point, there is The Crazies, both in 1973 and 2010); and
(d) the mutant/mutating fish people who have a hunger for human flesh, of
course.
There is certainly a – er – certain level
a cheesiness present, such as there always seems to be some fog around as
people are skulking about, even in a basement. Also, a hillneck (redbilly?) gal
in classic daisy dukes and a red checkered Italian restaurant tablecloth design
top tied in front falls for a mutant-to-be, a student ends up being an escapee
from the evil corporation, and there are hair curlers, beers, and white hazmat
suits, along with nudity and lots of decent gore, giving an overall nice scaly
shine.
The creatures are definitely a guy(s)
in rubber suits – and considering you never see more than one of the monsters
at a time, I guessing the same suit –
but actually it looks pretty decent for its budget, and I was impressed by
them. Truthfully, it looks better than many I’ve seen on shoots with a much
larger financial backing.
If you’re not used to these kinds of films,
the dialogue may sound a bit, well, stupid, but if you listen carefully with
heavy dose of humor, it’s hysterical. For example, when one character sees the
dead body of someone he knows, he yells, “Fuck me sideways! Noooooo!” There are
also a lot of racial and ethnic comments, and including pointed towards the
LGBTQQ+ demographic. This is, however, meant more to shine on the fallibilities
of those who are homophobic rather
than promoting it.
It’s interesting to see one of
Richard Griffin’s earliest releases (which I haven’t seen many) and compare
them with his latest (of which I have viewed a few). In this one, it was before
he had his revolving company of actors and crew that show up in many/most of
the later works. No Michael Thurber, no Sarah Nicklin or Michael Reed, and especially
no cinematography by Jill Poisson. His later works have a “look” that this one
does not. That’s not to say this film doesn’t look great, because it does, it’s
just… different. Good different.
Over the years, there is more
confidence built into a final product, and this one is definitely a growth
work. What I mean by that is as one learns a craft, one gets better at it (one
would hope), and not just in directorial skill, but in fashioning one’s own
style and look. On one hand, I think I would say that this looks like a
beginning film (it was his fourth) that one learns what’s possible and how to
do things more efficiently and effectively. That being said, even with that, it’s
actually above most early works of some bigger names (so far). I mean, compare
Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs (1993)
with The H8ful Eight (2016), or Cronenberg’s
Rabid (1977) with Eastern Promises (2007).
The viewer can see the skill set growth comparing them. The spark is definitely
there, as it is here, but the early films have a certain clunkiness to them
compared to their more advanced counterparts. There is certainly a clunky, amateurishness to this one, but
it definitely has that umph that
would make Griffin so good at what he does.
No comments:
Post a Comment