Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films, 2017
Images from the Internet
Creature Lake [aka Gitaskog]
Directed by Drazen Baric
BaricFilms
Productions / SlevinArts /
Wild Eye Releasing / MVD Visual
Wild Eye Releasing / MVD Visual
80
minutes, 2016 / 2017
I kinda like the sentiments behind this film a lot, which is:
respect the land and its guardians. In a time when the government is bullying
aboriginal people for their own profits with pipelines and possibly making the
area uninhabitable, there is a meta-message here.
Ivan Simanic |
We meet five friends who are total
greedy tools, not to mention racists (“C’mon, we were just joking…” types) that
take a trip into the deep woods “up north” (this Canadian release was filmed
near Mississauga, Ontario, which is just outside Toronto). It seems one of
them, Jason (Ivan Simanic), has plans to build vacation houses around a lake
that is sacred to the local indigenous people. Of course they don’t care about them;
it’s the ka-ching that is their
focus. They have no problems alienating the locals at a diner, and hell, they
even turn on their one black friend Conrad (Brandon Dhue), all in good fun. Yeah, they’re douches.
For example, during a drunken night
by the fire, when not insulting their only Black companion, one whines that
“Women are never satisfied.” Yeah, if you say that, there is a reason why that
is true, and it’s because of you, not
them. But it’s important that they be
douches for the story, so they can become fodder for both the titular lake
creature, and the natives who have no patience (and rightfully so) for those
who have no respect for their beliefs to a killer entity, echoing a theme from
the overrated Jug Face (2013).
So there are a few elements here that
take on other current films, such as the cabin
in the woods, and, sadly, the overused found
footage motif. If I may be permitted a brief rant here, please, if there is no end to this
format, can we at least have a moratorium for a year or two? Found footage is
so passé already, though there is a nice spoof here of the snot scene from the
granddaddy of this style, The Blair Witch
Project (1999; I’ve referenced this so much lately, I even know the year
without looking it up).
Anyway, getting back to the meat of
the matter, I’m grateful that the guys are their own age, rather than trying to
pass them off as teens or college students, as is so often the case with the cabin in the woods trope.
As is typical, not much happens in
the first half of the film, other than a cameo by Miss Canada of 2010, Elena
Semikina, though to be fair there are two or three good moments that lead up to
the fate that awaits.
Some of the effects (mostly digital)
are pretty good, and the creature looks great. When it makes its appearance
toward the end, it’s kind of worth the wait, even though it’s short. Plus there
is a disappearing nude woman and a younger (dressed) one that they do the dark
eyes and stretched mouth that has been used often, if I’m correct, starting
with Grave Encounters (2011). You can
see it in the trailer below.
Speaking of the creature, the
original name of the film is Gitaskog,
which is actually a real First Nations (the Canadian term for Native Americans)
name for a tentacled lake creature (HERE); it seems to be more common to find indigenous
names for beasties in films lately, such as with Stomping Ground (2014, which dealt with a Bigfoot).
One of my big gripes about found
footage films that seem to be somewhat consistent is that the cameras never
seem to run out of juice, the way guns keep firing in old westerns. These guys
are at a cabin/shack with no electricity for three days, run their cameras often
during that time, and yet my camera dies after a couple of hours. Suspension of
disbelief? I have less trouble with a fantastical tentacled lake creature than
I do with dubious camera power. What does that say about me?
I found it amusing that during the
introduction of the characters at the beginning, one of them, Todd (Greg
Carraro) has a strong Canadian accent (yes, that is a thing), though it’s not
really present during the rest of the film. Not a complaint in any kind of way,
just a bemused observation.
As found footage films go, this is
better than most I’ve seen recently, even with the running through the woods
shots (at least it’s during the day and not at night by the camera’s light, or
worse, the green “night vision” effect). There is no sadness in the loss of
these guys, as they don’t endear themselves to the viewer at all, but that did
not hurt the story. I would have liked to have seen the First Nations
characters be more sympathetic, to explain why
they were doing their actions, but that kind of gets lost (possibly because we
are seeing it literally through the eyes/lens of the five-some).
Also, I found it interesting that
some of these guys are dispatched by the gitaskog, and some by the creature’s
guardians, giving it a more human touch. But there are questions I have, of
course. One is, what is the purpose of the younger woman spirit that keeps
popping up? The naked woman (siren) makes sense at first, but in later appearances,
further from the lake, it’s of more questionable purpose. And lastly for now –
and this is more an observation than a question – this is the second found
footage film I’ve seen this month where the guy with the camera keeps focusing
in on his (female) partner’s ass.
The extras are a nice collection of Wild Eye Releasing trailers (including
for this film), and a nearly three-minute slideshow of drawings that would
eventually become the titular creature.
As found footagers go, as I said,
this one is decent and the effects are well done, so you might get a hoot out
of it. Since the acting is pretty respectable and naturalistic, considering
this is the only listing for most of the cast on IMDB, that’s also a bonus.
It’s not rocket science, but it’s a nice way to spend a rainy/snowy weekend
afternoon.
No comments:
Post a Comment