Showing posts with label sacrifice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sacrifice. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 10, 2021

Review: The Land of Blue Lakes

Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films, 2021
Images from the Internet

The Land of Blue Lakes (aka Земля Голубых Озер)
Directed by Arturs Latkovskis
[Self-produced]
72 minutes, 2021
www.facebook.com/landofbluelakes
https://vimeo.com/ondemand/357056

Though I tend to find most found footage flicks to be tiresome at best, right from The Blair Witch Project (1999), there have been some exceptions, such as M.O.M. (Mothers of Monsters) (2020) and Grave Encounters (2011). And, that being said, seeing one from the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic definitely piqued my interest.

So, yes, the film is in Russian with very easy-to-read subtitles (white letters in black boxes), so let’s be mature and get over that right now, ‘kay? With a miniscule budget of under USD$1,200, which basically would cover the food, gas/transportation, and perhaps kayak rentals, I wonder if Latvia has a film tax credit, or a Film Board with subsidies, as does Canada. I know, however, that this film was completely self-funded by the director (I asked).

As with Blair Witch, all five of the central characters are named after themselves, including the director/writer, who plays a version of himself. These five go into the wilderness of Latgale, to kayak along some beautiful waterways. If you look at a map of Latvia, you can see that there is a lot of natural areas. This makes me want to see it in person, even if that never happens. Of course, I’ll pass on the spooky stuff.

I don’t believe I’m giving anything away as this starts with title cards saying that all the participants were never seen again, and the footage was found on “the dark Web” (it’s always the dark Web, ain’t it?). While this intrigues the viewer (i.e., me), at the same time it also projects that the odds are there may be no “final girl” – or guy – and no good will come from the adventure. Of course, that is generally the direction found footage goes anyway, and this is quite the common opening trope. No negative feelings here, it is time to soldier on.

At the opening, we are introduced to the cast as they gather to head off into the wilds. It feels very natural, and I am assuming that most of the dialogue (if not the direction of the conversation) is ad-libbed on the spot. Arturs is also the main cameraperson, trading off on occasions with the others, especially his girlfriend Veronika Rumjanceva, which makes it easier without a crew needed to tag along. I am assuming that all of the five are friends of the director in the non-cinematic world as well, as this is their only IMDB credit for all of them. This means they know each other well enough to riff off the others’ personality, which is a good thing.

From this point, it almost feels like watching someone’s travel video, but I have to say, for some reason, I found the kayaking scenes through tall reeds visually stunning and interesting, more than even the somewhat mundane casual conversations as our three guys and two gals (others are Alina Sedova, Vladislavs Filipovs, and Edgars “Zuz” Jurgelans) float, eat and drink, going further into the lake district (while we don’t see other visitors at this point, there are roads/bridges and what looks like train tracks which they paddle under (more about this later). It feels both isolated and civilized at the same time, but they go further into remote areas.

Latgale is in the far eastern end of Latvia. The country is mostly Lutheran, but Latgale is historically more Roman Catholic and “Old Believers” Russian Orthodox (thank you Wikipedia). This Other view by the mainstream religion plays a part in the story, as our intrepid kayakers meet up with some “pagans” (I am assuming a distortion of non-Lutherans, as religious folk of any stripe are wont to be). They may not be interpreted as ferocious as, say, the Wrong Turn franchise, but these are more mystical and mysterious, showing up at unexpected moments.

Ever so slowly, we are introduced to the pagans, through runes and painted symbols, a dolls nailed to tree, and their own Point-of-View filming of the sleeping kayakers. The tension starts to build, but there is more boating yet to be done.

Another aspect I find interesting, as with, say, United States National Parks, there is an odd mix of wilderness and civilization, such as an unmanned weir and those road bridges that look forlorn. In the story, Latkovskis is a student of the Pagan religions of the region, so along the way, in bits and pieces, we get some nice exposition, such as about the angry Thunder Sky god, Pērkons, setting up for an enjoyable visit to an island with an ancient stone for sacrificing (surrounded by modern garbage from previous visitors) and rotted, abandoned boats that I would have loved to have photographed, as well (taking pictures of decay is one of my hobbies).

So, is it a supernatural thing that is haunting them, as in Blair Witch, or is it a more human element? Of course, I will not say, but the ending did come as a bit of a surprise, I am happy to report.

I am not sure why I found this so interesting, perhaps because I enjoy travelogues and seeing the cast’s real reactions to physical obstacles on their journey (e.g., fallen trees blocking their waterway). It is definitely a slow burn film, much in the way of Blair Witch or the Paranormal Activities franchise, and if you are a fan of those types, this might be right up your lake.


Sunday, December 29, 2013

Review: Jug Face

Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films, 2013
Images from the Internet

                            
Jug Face
Written and directed by Chad Crawford Kinkle. 
81 minutes, 2013
www.jugfacethemovie.com
www.Moderncine.com
www.Werenewco.com
www.moderndistrib.
www.MVDvisual.com

This film has had quite a number of festival selections, won some awards, and is listed on quite a number of Top 10 lists of the year. I can certainly understand that, as the acting is superb, the direction well handled, the tension palpable and the story is engaging through most of it. But for some reason it left me cold.

In the deep backwoods of Tennessee, there is an ancient creature living in a relatively shallow hole in the ground (called “the pit”) that has a few inches of water in it that trades good health in exchange for a sacrifice of its choosing, in a relationship similar to the Morlocks and Eloi. Whoever’s face appears on a potter’s jug (inspired by the unnamed being), they must have their throat cut and the blood spills down into the hole, satisfying the bloodlust until the next jug face.

We meet Amy (Lauren Ashely Carter, looking younger than her years), who is a teenager in trouble in many ways, including an affair with someone close to her, a friendship with a much older man (the potter, played excellently by Sean Bridges with just the right amount of pathos and innocence), promised to a rotund and boring neighbor nearer to her age, is pregnant (it says it right on the box, so I’m not giving anything away) in a society that demands virginity, and now she had found out she’s the next jug face. To make matters worse, if that’s possible, she’s stolen the jug before anyone sees it, causing death in her wake.

Because the thing in “the pit wants what it wants,” the community will do whatever it takes to keep it satisfied, due to its “taking” others until its chosen wants are met. On top of that, those who die by its hand that have not been chosen are cursed to wander the woods for eternity.

This sounds like it could be a hoot, but it fails in my opinion. Why? For many reasons, not all of which I will tell because of giving away too much, but here are some thoughts. The tentacle being, which we only see in extremely quick edits and blurs of motion – to keep the suspense, I’m sure, but c’mon – is supposed to be a religion of sorts, perhaps being an analogy of the fanaticism of those who follow Jeebus, in some way. Well, with the exception of what was written and rewritten and transcribed and rewritten and transcribed, religion is based solely on faith that something had happened a long time ago, can happen now, or will happen at a later point. The being in the hole, however, is now and visceral, its effects immediate and destruction by its figurative hands a real consequence. This is not religion, because there is no faith in the unknown. It’s desires are made known and you damn well better obey.

Due to this, I wonder why this community is committed to keeping its number small. I mean, the more who live there, the better the odds of survival. If you live in a community of 20 and every couple of years someone has to go, well, I don’t like the odds. Why they don’t all leave is another question. Is it a matter of “my land, my honor”? Screw that. If there was a creature living on my block that demanded that someone from the block has to be fed to it, well, I’m not staying in that neighborhood, never mind the city. It defies logic to me.

Everyone in the area treats every day like its normal. I’d be shitting bricks wondering if it was me, my partner, or my kids who were next. In a community that small, I would be heartbroken if anyone was chosen. These people are poor as dirt, Amy’s father sells moonshine to store owner in town to make any money.

Perhaps I’m reading this wrong. Maybe it’s not about religion, but politics. I mean, poor people – especially in the deep south, it seems – tend to vote against their own best interests (i.e., Republican) so maybe it makes sense they would stay around, even if it means the possibility of self-harm. That could be why I was so frustrated by the relationships in the film.

There are some decent gore applications, including a dismembered hand here, an unconnected intestine there, and especially some throat slicing, but much of the action is a whirl of motion and editing that leaves much of the actual attacks as wanting, for me.

Lastly, I found the ending to be unsatisfying, and an easy out. I’m not going to say what it is, but surely there could have been a more going against the grain, rather than… well, what it is.

As a side note, I think it’s cool that the central character’s parents are played by Larry Fessennden and a frumpy looking Sean Young, who also played the parents of the central character in the 2005 film, Headspace (reviewed HERE).

As for the extras, there is an interesting albeit standard “making of” documentary that lasts for 30 minutes so you get to hear the origins and meet the cast / crew, the trailer, and a short written and directed by Kinkle called “Organ Grinder.” That was fun, even in its six-minute length.

Pay attention to what I say, or listen to the others, it’s all good. I have no ego in this, as it’s not my film. Considering that more have liked it than I have, it may be worth your checking it out. Actually, listen to no one and make your own choices, unlike the people in this film.