Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films,
2015
Images from the Internet
Reality Films / Alchemy Werks
World Wide Multi Media
57 minutes, 2014 / 2015
www.reality-entertainment.com
www.Sector5films.net
www.mvdvisual.com
Images from the Internet
Angel Maker: Serial Killer Queen
Directed by O.H. KrillReality Films / Alchemy Werks
World Wide Multi Media
57 minutes, 2014 / 2015
www.reality-entertainment.com
www.Sector5films.net
www.mvdvisual.com
Next
to Elizabeth Bathory (1560-1614), Britain’s Amelia Dyer (1837-1896) is
considered the most prolific serial killer known, with an estimated 400 infant
deaths by her hands during the last quarter of the 19th century (an average of
20 per year). Living in poverty, this matronly granny started taking care of
babies – mostly illegitimate – and either starved or strangled (via a cloth cord)
them to get more, dumping the bodies in the Thames.
You
see, there was a process called Baby Farming, where you gave up your infant by
paying someone to be sure that the child was taken care of (we now call that
having a full-time nanny as many celebrities and those very rich are known to
do), or adopted out. A flat fee was paid, so if more money was to be found,
there had to be a turnover (aka free
market capitalism). The more children, the more money.
This
extremely slow moving documentary tells us a bit about the culture that led to
this practice as a whole, and Dyer individually. A narrator tells the story in
bits and pieces over mostly black and white public domain film clips, or over
vintage photos, mostly of dead babies; taking pictures of dead children either
alone or as a whole family was a “thing” early in photography to help remember
those who passed on. Many of these images are used over and over and over and
over again.
While
I found the information itself interesting, as I knew a smattering about her
and it was good to learn more, this is not a very good documentary as a whole.
After all if the discussion is about a serial killer I really shouldn’t be
bored by 15 minutes in. The problem is trifold. First, as I stated, images are
used multiple times, so there really isn’t much to look at other than trying to
guess the origin of the film clips (they are listed in the end credits if you
want to check them off); one has Victor Mature talking to Aunt Bea (Frances
Bavier), who actually is physically somewhat close to our Ms. Dyer, perhaps why
they used this clip as its otherwise unconnected. Second, I can understand that
the story of Dyer is dire, but the monotone clipped tone of the narrator is
more drone that anything else.
But
the biggest problem with the film is that it’s a two-pound potato in a 25-pound
bag. In other words, the film is actually about 20 minutes long, tops, but
there are so many extended and unnecessary gaps between most sentences for the
purpose of lengthening, that it starts to get really annoying in short order. Imagine if this review was written
with one or two sentences per page, and you knew you had to be on each page for
a minute or two, that could give you some idea of what I am talking about. If
the script was read at a normal pace, that would mean less repetition of images,
and a quicker and more interesting pace.
The
text for the story is fine; the poison in the pudding really is the pacing. In
fact, you can get just about all the core info you need, including Dyer fate,
from the trailer (below). That is not accomplished filmmaking, it is (owl) stretching
time. Perhaps this was a telly show over the Pond and it needed to be this
length? That’s the only reason I can think of other than the greed of trying to
get this into theaters or festivals as a feature rather than a short. Not worth
it for the viewer.
The
redeeming feature of the film is pointing out the social politics of pure
capitalism, with the wide divide between rich and poor and the latter getting
royally screwed (pun intended). Pre-union, there was no way for people to
thrive without some regulation, and a large share were literally worked to
death. Baby farming became a reality because people could not financially care
for their own children. And this is an aside, but this is also what the Republicans
are trying to bring back. The lack of care of the mental ill under this type of
social structure is also discussed, though not deeply enough. Focusing more on
these as a bookend to Dyer’s story would have certainly filled up those time
gaps, but this is just lazy.
The
trailers for other documentaries on the DVD look equally dismal, including one explaining
how the Loch Ness monster is actually a space alien, and another exposing that
the United States is being run by the Masons; I almost expected it to be about the
supposed Illuminati when the trailer began.
Do
yourself a favor and look up the info about Dyer on a Serial Killer fan site,
or even on Wikipedia, from which this film is almost rewritten point by point.
You’ll definitely get the same image of her. Or, if you have the time and patience, there is this documentary.
No comments:
Post a Comment