Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films,
2016
Images from the Internet
The Inhabitants: Standard Edition
Written and directed by the
Rasmussen Brothers (Michael and Shawn)
Lascaux Media / Sinister Siblings Films
/
Film Rise / MVD Visual
Film Rise / MVD Visual
90
minutes, 2015 / 2016
I
love when a title has a cool double or even triple entendre to it. As an example, this one works quite well, and I’ll
get to that in a sec.
Michael
and Shawn Rasmussen, who apparently like to be known as “The writers of John
Carpenter’s The Ward” (2010),” also
wrote and directed this one, the second feature for which they sat in the main
chair(s). The outcome is a different vision when you can make the whole film
you write, so this gives them some freedom of self-expression.
This
was filmed at the Noyes-Parris House (built in 1669), somewhere in a wooded
suburban area of Wayland, MA, approximately 30 miles due west from Salem. The Heritage
Home, which doubles for the March Carriage B&B here, actually has an
historical, sinister connection to the infamous witch trials, giving some
credibility to the look and tone of the film.
Elise Couture Stone |
Into
the picture come Dan (Michael Reed) and Jessica (Elise Couture Stone), a young
couple who buy the mysterious B&B from its previous owner (Judith Chaffee),
a widow who has been sinking into senility. Pretty early on – enough towards
the beginning I don’t feel like I’ve giving away anything – we learn that the
house was originally owned by a woman named Lydia (India Pearl), a witch who was hanged in – yep – 1669. Needless to say, she hasn’t exactly vacated
the premises, and has found ways to create a family writ large.
If
you watch the trailer, which gives away too much of the story, pretty soon you
know wifey is under Lydia’s spell; this spells (pun intended) trouble for just
about anyone and everyone. So, this brings me to the point I mentioned earlier
about the entendre: are the Inhabitants the earthly ones living
in the house, the supernatural ones lingering (as the band Sparks might sing),
or the supernatural one inside the living one? Gotta say, whichever way, it
works.
India Pearl |
The
premise itself is hardly new, and I even predicted most of the ending about a
third of the way through: been there, seen that. That being said, and this is a
big however, the Brothers Rasmussen
have taken an old motif and really worked it like kneading a raisin challah.
The end result is quite delicious, even if you’ve eaten that kind before.
There
are some really nice jump scares, but that is due to both the surprise and a
lot to the make-up, which is really top notch Lydia and the others look just
plain free-kaaay, with the wide,
white eyes. Again, I’ve seen this so many times before, but the look and
lighting works so well together to make it pop. I admit freely that ghost
stories have always been my favorites; spookies + body count = happiness, for
me. That does not mean that all of this genre are good, but this one certainly
is better than most I’ve seen recently.
Michael Reed |
The
acting is also quality work. For example, Reed has never disappointed, even in
outrageous roles (e.g., The Disco
Exorcist [2011]). If I recall correctly, he may be using his own jacket
because I could have sworn I’ve seen the (faux) fur-color thing before. But I
digress… Here, as the husband who is trying to work out what the hell is
happening to his life-partner while still trying to maintain his own space in
the house, he comes across as both strong and flawed. Couture is the
centerpiece of the film, as the wife who is dealing with a supernatural
assault. She gets to play the role in two modes, being a loving wife for the
first half, and then nearly as a somnambulist as she is influenced by the evil
being living in her home. As the evil Lydia, the lovely Pearl dons the fright
make-up and goes full throttle as the wicked witch of Wayland. Her scenes are
short, but she makes her presence (pun intended) known to the viewer.
My
complaint about the film, as I stated before, is that the trailer gives away
too much, so I recommend seeing the film instead. But that note is a minor
chord, as the film really is a fun watch, from beginning to end. While there is
little character development, you do get the impression that the couple love
each other, and you feel the ominousness almost from the gecko (yes, I know it’s “get-go”). Plus the effects
are also enjoyable; the blood is not plentiful (and rightfully so for the story),
and also seems to have the right consistency, i.e., doesn’t ooze like chocolate
syrup.
The
house, the lighting, the editing, the acting and the story all work together to
create a totally enjoyable ghostie. By “Standard Version,” as this release is
called, I am assuming means that it is CD rather than Blu-Ray, and perhaps has
less extras, but that’s okay, as it still packs quite a punch.
Part
of the reason why this is such a fun flick, as I’ve mentioned before, is the
pacing of the film. What I mean by that is the Bros. don’t fall into the trap
that many do: normally, I really hate the whole walking cautiously through the
dark house / basement / cellar / woods / scenes with a flashlight (or candle,
depending on the film), in what feels like an endless padding of time. The
suspense is kept in play because it’s done in short segments. Also, it’s not so dark that all you can see is whatever
the light falls upon, nor is it a shaky camera, for once; thank you for that. Makes
me forgive you for (please read the rest of the sentence in a Maxwell Smart
voice) the old moving-the-bathroom-cabinet-mirror-and-suddenly-the-ghost-is
-behind-the-person trick.
Other
than chapters, the only extras are two different types of sound and subtitles
(always appreciated).
This
is one of the better indie films I’ve seen this year. The Rasmussens have taken
some tired and tried ideas and actually improved them to the point where I didn’t
feel, really?! That is actually
saying a lot. Go and check it out. A great Halloween watch.
No comments:
Post a Comment