Showing posts with label Catholic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 31, 2021

Reviews: Four Gore Films of Davide Pesca

Reviews: Four Gore Films of Davide Pesca

 Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films, 2021
Images from the Internet

Note that these four films are listed chronologically, rather than in the order in which I watched them. Also, the screener versions that I saw were low rez and grainy, but I am sure if you rent the film, it will be in a much higher resolution. The trailers for all four films are after the reviews.

 

Suffering Bible
Directed by Davide Pesca
Demented Gore Productions
65 minutes, 2018
www.digitmovies.com/

Although this is not a long film, it was the first full feature Pesca directed, and ironically, the last of the four films I watched. The Bible is a very apropos topic for a film centered on gore and body horror, as the book is filled with genocide, incest, child rape, slavery, infanticide, and multiple killings of animals (along with talking serpents and donkeys).

Pesca has a certain style that he employs on all these films, which are short stories stitched together to form a theme. The camera is often handheld (jerky, but not seasick worthy like, say, 2008’s Cloverfield. There is also minimal talking, usually dubbed but occasionally with subtitles, and use of multiple monochrome filters (black and white, blue, etc.), though sometimes he uses an ultra-chromatic filter for colorful effects. But the main focus of all his films is the gore factor, which is ripe and rife, often involving body organs. Pesca does all the SFX himself, and generally it looks really amazing, considering the budget, which is low-Lira…oops, I mean Euros. As for the stories, they are there for the gore, rather than the other way around, and may make you say, che cosa?

There are five stories – or Acts – here, with the bookends (and between each story) being a naked man and a nude woman, individually, with bandages on their heads crawl through a forest on their stomachs. By the end, it’s obvious which Biblical story to which this refers.

As for the stories themselves, the it starts with “Act 1: My Only God.” In this tale, two ex-friends are, well, reunited, for lack of a better term. Truthfully, I am not sure what story this references in the Bible. “Act II: San Toma,” as in St. Judas Thomas. A self-flagellating man (monk?) – an event that was common during the Middle Ages (see Monty Pythonand the Holy Grail (1975) – hallucinates Jeebus appearing on a cross, and he does what a Doubting Thomas would do, but more so. We learn eating the “body of Christ” (not on a cracker) is not always a positive thing.

“Act III: In the Name of the Father” is next. A woman who is sensually attracted to an old book (it looks like a dictionary, but it could possibly be a stand-in for a Bible) and a cross with the image of Jeebus on it, does some damage to herself in self-erotic ecstasy. My question here is, I realize Jeebus supposedly wants us unbelievers to burn for eternity, but does “he” really want his followers to suffer at their own hands this much, as well? Seems more Darwinian. But, I digress…

Next up is “Act IV: The Pact.” As might be expected, a depressed woman makes a deal with a mysterious and devilish woman for riches and beauty, which cannot end well and, considering the context of the film this is in, one might add bloody. The piper must be paid. This is my favorite segment in the film. For the final piece, “Act V: Redemption of the Lost Souls,” we meet three people, an OD’d junkie, a tuberculosis victim, and an old man who was homeless, as they meet their judgments. Were they good or were they bad, and what was their fate? Again, context. There was a brief coda to this one with a gift that I did not quite understand.

There are no real stories here, just vignettes into bloody religiosity, which is a comment on the state of spirituality throughout the last 2000 years, where suffering is equated with religion, to supposedly understand the suffering “the Lord” went through the days before Good Friday for “your sins.” Pesca plays on that rather than narration, and is effective in that mode.

Ironically, most of the people in this film (and the others) about the Bible are tattooed, which the Leviticus poo-poos on as much as homosexuality. Again, I digress…

 

Dead Butterfly: The Prophecy of Suffering Bible (aka Suffering Bible 2)
Directed by Davide Pesca
Demented Gore Productions
56 minutes, 2019
www.digitmovies.com/

This film is a collection of individual scenes related only by their connection to extreme and distorted versions of Catholicism and religiosity. There is very little dialogue, but what there is, is in Italian with very clear captions (i.e., easy to discern; not white on white).

The start is a woman (the beautiful Barbara Sirotti) who receives a gift (a theme which would be revisited in another form in “Dust to Dust” from Grand Guignol Madness: Show Your Fear; see review below) of a liquid in a vial and virtual reality glasses presenting a Christ-like figure that proves to show the opposite of what is happening in the physical world (“Heaven’s Doors”). Then a religious woman puts a chained (and I believed drugged) man through the tortures and then some of Jesus’ last days before befalling her own fate (“The Saint’s Friday”). Another man burying something in the woods befalls a bloody end by a possible ghost with a screwdriver (“The Secret”). After a jewel robbery (including a butterfly necklace) the older woman victim does a bit of voodoo on the younger woman who stole her possessions (“Do Not Steal”). In the last tale, a woman is tortured and beaten by cool looking techno-demons in hell (I believe) for her Earthly crimes, such as adultery and taking the Lord’s name in vain after a desperate act (“The Judgment”; see, this is why I am an atheist),

The gore is explicit and plentiful, as is the top body parts of much of the female cast. While not as sophisticated as Pesca’s later works, as far as the graphics (both SFX and digital FX), it is easy to see the talent in the way the film is constructed. He is also setting up his auteur workings through the type of gore he employs, and the use of vignettes, or original short stories combined with a wraparound that is inserted as bookends, and between each tale that is in black and white, as a man puts sharp objects (hooks, pins, etc.) through his skin on different parts of his body in self-harming religious fervor (“The Angel”); I could not watch these parts, in all honesty.

 

Grand Guignol Madness: Show Your Fear
Directed by Davide Pesca
Demented Gore Productions; Digitmovies Alternative Entertainment; Home Movies
67 minutes, 2020
www.digitmovies.com/

Right from the start, the film lets us know where it is thematically heading with the title card that reads (in Italian): “The sound of the lament caused by suffering is almost identical to the groan caused by pleasure.” Shades of Hellraiser (1987)!

The film is an anthology; a collection of Pesca’s shorts made especially for this release. The framework is that a woman is kidnapped, and forced, through electrodes, to experience the terrible things that happen to the people we see in the shorts, while bound to a chair in a laboratory (“Broken Mind”).

Each story is mostly silent with musical backgrounds, though what little Italian dialogue is spoken does not deter from the stories. They involve the likes of a gift to an online nude model gone wrong (“Dust to Dust”), a nature-loving photographer deciding to go all Dexter on some litterers and polluters (“Save the Planet”), a strip-off contest going horribly wrong (“The Competition”), an obsessive body builder misusing steroids (“Muscles”), a lonely woman who is out to capture a man’s heart (“The Heartbreaker”), and a model in underwear who is posing for a photographer has a negative reaction to the many exposures to the flash of the camera (“Shot my Soul”).

Each vignette has its own style and look, usually through a mostly monochrome or hyper- chromatic filter. The major themes seem to be revenge, stripping, tattoos and fingers in wounds, with an occasional side order of someone holding someone else’s organs.

The effects range from a bit cheesy to very effective, and there is a lot of it as it is the point in the whole exercise, hence the title, which is based on a theater in Paris that ran from 1897 to 1962 that specialized in realistic shows of graphic horror. The title is effective, and it is an interesting watch for a gorehound.

 

Night of Doom
Directed by Davide Pesca
Demented Gore Productions
61 minutes, 2021
www.digitmovies.com/

For this story, Doom is the name of a powdered drug that seems to be similar to Bath Salts in that it causes violent psychosis. According to a newscast, the crime rate is up 40 percent and the drug is rampant in Italy, where this is filmed (it is dubbed into English; note that the trailer below is in its original Italian). While the topic of addiction to Doom is not mentioned, it is (for me) assumed by the desire for it.

That being said, this is as much as about the drug as it is focused on sado-masochism, and snuff entertainment. While not an anthology film, there are a series of vignettes that overlap, and some return, making this somewhat narrative, but also being a bit esoteric in how it is presented.

There are lots of primary colors used for lighting, specifically blue and red, and the camera work is quite imaginative, sometimes with nearly psychedelic green screen backgrounds.

The largest part of the story focuses on a televangelist who, in the name of the Lord, is into B&D, S&M, erotic asphyxiation, and yes, of course, Doom. A bit of it is for himself, but most is for his loved one that he leaves bound and gagged while he is away from home.

The drug is the spine of the film, but the meat and bones is a commentary about religion (heavily leaning towards Catholic; though would Mother Mary have had painted nails?) and S&M, and how sometimes they philosophically satisfy the same needs; though not blatantly stated, it is presented as such in a more subtle means. And that is the only subtly in this film’s actions.

One thing I will mention as far as men and women, they are similarly treated badly, and equally being the perpetrators of the violence (except there is a much better chance that the women will be dressed sexually, if at all).

Amid all the violence, there is a touch of humor here and there, such as the presentation of Miss Bathory Body Lotion that is presented as nearly an inserted commercial. That’s a bloody good joke (pun intended).

I especially like that the person ending up being the main character is not who you might expect, but certainly this actor is the best of the batch. This is definitely low budget (you even get to see the boom mic in one shot), and Pesca managed to do a lot with a little.

This film could fall into the artistic Transgressive subgenre, and I have seen a lot of body horror, but I have to say, thematically, I was more interested in the drug end than the S&M, which is something I have never found appealing. The film is well-made and creative in camera work, visual effects, and SFX – especially on this budget – but even though I enjoy gore effects, which are done well here, the torture stuff was a bit much for me at times. Ahh, I’m getting old.

 







Sunday, June 20, 2021

Review: Malefice - A True Story of a Demonic Haunting

Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films, 2021
Images from the Internet

Malefice: A True Story of a Demonic Haunting.
Directed by Billy Lewis
Orange St. Films; Scarenetwork.tv
91 minutes, 2021
www.scarenetwork.tv/

Let me start off by showing my hand: I am a religion skeptic. I believe there is no real evidence for the existence of a god, let alone the devil. I have never been a Christian, and was not raised in a Christian household. However, I do believe “good” energy attracts “good” energy, and “bad” attracts “bad,” even though I have no real basis for that belief, which is just as reliable as the Judeo-Christian heritage.

That all being said, I approach this documentary with the question of whether or not it is a Christian film. Sure, nearly all exorcism films have Christian elements, especially Catholic, as is the nature of the – err – beast, but there is a difference between, say, The Exorcist (1973) and the unintentionally funny and obscure Christian demonic possession film from the early 1970s, The Enemy.

Sean Austin, Eric Connor

What I am assuming is also driving this film (again, before seeing it) is the number of “psychic” and “supernatural” reality television shows that are readily available and common on cable. In fact, the head of the team here, Sean Austin, was the lead investigator on The Travel Channel show “Ghost Loop” (I do not believe I have ever seen it, as I do not watch TTC).

This film, we are told, was shot over a four-day period in a maskless COVID-19-heavy January 2021, on an acreage somewhere in Northern Ohio; the cast and crew drove up from North Carolina. We meet the two protagonists, Austin and “clairvoyant” Dave Spinks, who are heavily into prayer, start off by explaining a previous experience at the house in 2015, as we hear an electronic voice phenomena (EVP) recording of a demon and his victims talking. Honestly, the believability is already getting close to being out the window for me, but that does not mean it is not fun.

This definitely is preachy, and is directed towards the Catholic Christian god (apparently, if you envision in your mind’s eye a white dove, a female passes over to heaven, and for men, it’s a white horse), ignoring all the other thousands of gods that are worshiped around the world. But then again, Ohio is a “Red” state, so no surprise there.

Ralph Sarchie

Ten minutes in, we get a sermon on God and Jesus from Zoom guest star Ralph Sarchie, a Catholic Demonologist (and Austin’s mentor) who is a retired NYPD Sergeant, and was the model used in the film, Deliver Us From Evil (2014; Eric Bana played him). At this point, I am not sure if this is a film denouncing demons or an excuse for promoting Jeebus.

After the 30-minute or so introduction, Austin and Spinks return to the house with buddy and paranormal investigator Eric Conner (who wears crucifix earrings and says “dude” a lot). And what is their purpose? In the words of the film’s publicity: to rebuke the demon by “sending it back to where it belongs…HELL!” Will they succeed? I’m not tellin’.

Almost immediately there are sounds and screams (EVP). And while they do react to it, they also seem pretty damn calm. One of the questions I have is whether or not the three folks involved believe in this. I honestly would say, both yes and no. On one hand, I do believe that they are certain of God and the Debbil, and they are doing a service to try and convert the unbelievers. On the other hand, whether this story is real, I’m not convinced. If a demon is threatening them, especially Austin and Connor starting at about the halfway mark, they sure do not seem to feel overly nervous if this was real. Perhaps it is because they have JC on their side? Or perhaps foolish bravado? Or they are performing a narrative to preach?

What really got under my skin though, personally, is how anti-abortion the film is (fetuses are repeatedly referred to as “babies,” who are “screaming out”), with the “bad guy,” Robert (either influenced or possessed by a demon) having been an abortionist at the turn of the 20th Century, when the house was a brothel. Apparently, the demon made Robert enjoy his work, and torture women. Could it be any more of a Catholic pro-birth agenda (rather than pro-life)?

There are lots of images of a hillside with a huge cross on it that looks right out of a Hallmark card. And there aren’t just hints of religious fervor, there are actually sermons, like I said, and devotions, such as “The Lord’s Prayer” from “Matthew.” Despite the compelling and enjoyable story, there are so many hiccups and God stuff; it is distracting, for example, when Austin repeatedly says “Oh, shit” such as after a EVP conversation with the demon, and even the occasional F-bomb. Austin explains that anything in threes (such as knocking) is a mockery of the Holy Trinity, and their aim is to twist the human’s “free will.” Nearly all religions in the world do not have a holy Trinity, so does that mean every other religion is wrong? And even if they believe that, well, so does most other religions (my god can beat up your god).

There is an interesting meta-aspect of this documentary, which is not uncommon in ”reality” shows; in this case, the director, who calls himself a skeptic, describes what it was like to shoot the film, and events he found odd. I find this kind of aspect interesting, as the crew looks at its own production.

Through the first three days, there are lots of voices and sounds through the EVP, and the fourth is the actual exorcism of the property, which is essentially, you got it, more praying. Does the ritual work? Watch the film, and then you tell me. Maybe in 2025 or ‘26, after another five years or so, they should go back and follow-up. I would be interested in that.

Is this something that can be seen as a pseudo-event, in the words of Daniel Boorstein, or something more sinister? Either way, let’s talk about the production itself for a moment. Billy Lewis actually did a bang-up job here, putting the transcriptions of the “voices” from the EVP on the screen, making it easier to follow along. That was a really smart thing to do; as with every supposed EVP I have ever heard, it is really hard to make out (though sometimes the voices are suspiciously clear). Is it a case of we hear it because it is on the screen? Couldn’t tell you, but I am grateful they did that, otherwise it would be too distracting by trying to focus on that rather than the story.

As for distracting, the film is actually nicely compelling for the most part, but it is way too preachy to be completely comfortable. It comes off more as a religious propaganda tract than a fun flick to watch on a Saturday night, but even with that being said, it took a bit to get into it, but as time wore on and I was able to somewhat weed out a bit of the religious talk, I started to enjoy it more. Again, it is put together really well all things considered, and may be your cuppa if you like spirituality reality shows and/or need conformation of your beliefs. You just know this will be recommended in churches across every Red State, especially below the Mason-Dixon line, even though it is Catholic-based rather than evangelical.

The film is exclusive to the spankin' new streaming platform, ScareNetwork.tv.




Wednesday, September 25, 2019

Review: The VelociPastor


Text © Richard Gary / Indie Horror Films, 2019
Images from the Internet


The VelociPastor
Directed by Brendan Steere
Cyfuno Ventures / Hollow Tree Films / Laika Come Home /
Wild Eye Releasing / MVD Entertainment
75 minutes, 2018

I’ll be honest with ya, as I always am… I try to review things in the order I get them, but as soon as I saw this, I put all others aside and threw this on the player. Some films project that they are so bad that they grab your attention and say, “Oh, you’re gonna wanna see this” to me. A priest who turns into a velociraptor? I’m all in, dude!

It’s important to note that this is not just a version of a werewolf film, it’s actually more. In no particular order, it’s an homage to the amazing bad horror films of the mid-VHS period of the late ‘70s-early ‘80s, before there was CGI (most of the effects are practical, but there is one key digital moment during a flashback sequence in the middle); also it’s as played-straight comedy filled deliberate errors to emulate the micro-budget VHS features; it’s brilliant in its own goofy way; and there are so many genres thrown in and mixed in a bowl here it’s bound to get your attention, a multitude of styles of movie mayhem from that period you liked.

Greg Cohan
So, let’s break it down a bit, first with what’s going on, in the most surface of ways as I don’t want to ruin any of it for you. After a tragedy, Father Doug Jones (buffed-out Greg Cohan) travels to Asia where he comes in possession of an artifact that lets him turn into the titular creature: a very rubberized man-in-a-suit that looks more like a mini-T-Rex. Meanwhile he comes to the acquaintance of forbidden love object and hooker Carol (Alyssa Kempinski, who has some killer cheek bones), while gangsters and a Chinese warlord priest with Japanese Ninja guards who speak Korean come sniffin’ around with various agendas. Then in Family Guy fashion, there’s those flashback memories of family and war. Who will win the battle for Doug’s soul, as it were?

 
Okay, now for the framework of the film. This isn’t the first one of use deliberate measures to show low budget and incompetence (Richard Griffin’s Seven Dorms of Death [2015] comes to the top of my head), but it’s still a hoot. Here, there are action shots missing with a notice for the CGI to be added later, and when a head is ripped off, it’s pretty obvious (i.e., intentionally) that it’s a store mannequin’s topper. The fight scenes are straight out of the Dolemite school of martial arts. There are other fine moments that had me laughing out loud, but I’ll leave that as a bonus when you see it.

Alyssa Kepinski
The acting, again, is a mix of purposefully hammy and dead serious, and the two leads especially not only excel in this (it’s actually harder for a good actor to pretend to be bad, than the other way around), but really seem to be having a blast playing these roles. Meanwhile there’s lots of blood and cheesy-type gore, enough to make a splatterfest fiend smile, but not necessarily turn off a neophyte fan of the red stuff.

There are some decent extras here, including an amusing nearly 9-minute gag reel, the film’s trailer (along with a bunch of others), captions that can be a bit on the quick side, and at the Texas Fightmare 2019 Festival Midnight Screening Q&A hosted by Matt D. (representing Wild Eye) that lasts over 28 minutes. Usually the sound quality for these festivals is terrible, but this one wasn’t too bad, I’m happy to say. Present are the director, Cohan and producer Jesse Gouldsbury. The group were amusing, telling great stories and explaining the genesis of the film (originally a school project of the director’s) with humor straight across.

Then there is the film commentary, which I was looking forward to hearing; it is also Steere, Cohan and Gouldsbury. Sometimes it’s a bit hard to tell who is talking, but most of what they are saying is fun and relevant (though there’s a bit of dross, such as discussing the food they are eating while recording the commentary). There is a bit of overlap from the festival Q&A, but that is common and forgivable. Mostly it’s enjoyable, and it’s pretty obvious these guys get along. I do wish that Kempinski was in on it, too; I think hearing a female perspective would have enriched the experience, but I don’t want it to sound like I’m complaining, because I’m not.

One of the strong points of the film is the look and editing. There is a lot of split-screen action that is incredibly well done for a group that is this novice, i.e., haven’t made that many features yet. Steere discusses how time-consuming certain scenes were, and I believe it. Beautiful to look at and kept the pace moving along.

My favorite scene in the film is towards the end, involving the Ninjas during an emotional moment, but I won’t give it away. There is talk in the commentary about a sequel in the works. If that’s so, I am so up for it. It’s actually quite difficult to purposefully make a “bad” film and have it shine like this hybrid horror / action / kung fu flick.